A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

before he said reference or relation to some other matter doth distinguish a cerem. from order, because a Cerem. hath such a relation, and order as order hath not: but now he telleth us of double relations one in order, and another in ceremo. Secondly he fighteth here without an adversary, except he understand by matters of order, mere order, and by matters of Ceremo. such observations, as are significant by institution, for no man doubteth but Cerem. lawful and unlawful also may be done in order.

before he sayd reference or relation to some other matter doth distinguish a cerem. from order, because a Cerem. hath such a relation, and order as order hath not: but now he telleth us of double relations one in order, and another in ceremo. Secondly he fighteth here without an adversary, except he understand by matters of order, meere order, and by matters of Ceremo. such observations, as are significant by institution, for no man doubteth but Cerem. lawfull and unlawfull also may be done in order.

In the example of this rule, the Rej. is so subtle in his subliming and refining of notions, that he hath these words: The observance of the order appointed for reading, singing, praying, &c. is in respect of that order of the substance thereof, but referred to divine service is a cerem. In this (I say) no more good sense appears then needs must, for putt those words together: The observance of order, in respect of that order is of the substance thereof: without all question: as a man in respect of the same man is of his substance: So also the observance of a cerem. in respect of that ceremony is of the substance thereof: Here is no difference, neither indeed can any difference be intelligibly feigned betwixt order of divine service, and ⟨p. 35⟩order in relation to divine service, but human Cerem. must thus be handled.

In the example of this rule, the Rej. is so subtile in his subliming and refining of notions, that he hath these words: The observance of the order appointed for reading, singing, praying, &c. is in respect of that order of the substance thereof, but referred to divine service is a cerem. In this (I say) no more good sense appeares then needs must, for putt those words together: The observance of order, in respect of that order is of the substance thereof: without all quaestion: as a man in respect of the same man is of his substance: So also the observance of a cerem. in respect of that ceremony is of the substance thereof: Here is no difference, neither indeed can any difference be intelligiblely fayned betwixt order of divine service, and