A19142:326
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The ninth and last Consectary is: 1That Ceremonies may in regard of their general kind and end be worship, so far as they are in their kind parts of order and decency, and yet in their particulars, not be of the substance of order, comeliness, worship. We are at last therefore come to a strange reckoning.2 Cer. are in their kind, parts of order, & yet (as we were told pag. 31.) that order so far as it is order, is in that respect no ceremony. 2. A Ceremo. in respect of the genus and end is worship, and yet in the consectary immediately going before, it was peremptorily pronounced, that use and end maketh not a Ceremony part of Divine worship: I take the cause of this cross Doctrine to be, that human ceremonies in divine worship, are such a cross knot, that he who seeks to open the conveyances of it, must needs run cross in his thoughts and words. To make this crossing more plain, let us first debate (a little more fully) the truth of this corollary,3 and then see what followeth therefrom. We here have three conclusions.
The nynth and last Consectary is: 1That Ceremonies may in regard of their generall kynd and end be worship, so farr as they are in their kynd parts of order and decency, and yet in their particulars, not be of the substance of order, comlines, worship. We are at last therfore come to a strange reckoning.2 Cer. are in their kynd, parts of order, & yet (as we were tould pag. 31.) that order so farr as it is order, is in that respect no ceremony. 2. A Ceremo. in respect of the genus and end is worship, and yet in the consectary immediately going before, it was peremptorily pronounced, that use and end maketh not a Ceremony part of Divine worship: I take the cause of this crosse Doctrine to be, that humaine ceremonies in divine worship, are such a crosse knott, that he who seeks to open the conveyances of it, must needs run crosse in his thoughts and words. To make this crossing more plaine, let us first debate (a little more fully) the truth of this corallarie,