A19142:366
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
It was but a poor proof therefore of the Rej. to allege, that which Bell▪ saith of some Ceremonies, as if it did agree to all popish Cerem. and that in the common judgment of Papists. Calvin speaking in the person of Sorbonical Drs, declareth their opinion to be; That Ceremonies bind consciences by accident, to wit, 1because of their ratification, in that the church intend this, and the people consent. Lastly the judgment of Papists is clear, that they putt no holiness in the Cerem. instituted, you must place no holiness in images, Concil. Trid. Sess. 25. By this which hath been said, it is (as I think sufficiently manifested, that the differences betwixt all popish Cere. and ours, of worship, necessity, holiness, and sinful omission, are vainly and without ground alleged by the Rej.
It was but a poore proof therfore of the Rej. to alledge, that which Bell▪ sayth of some Ceremonies, as if it did agree to all popish Cerem. and that in the common judgment of Papists. Calvin speaking in the person of Sorbonicall Drs, declareth their opinion to be; That Ceremonies bynd consciences by accident, to witt, 1because of their ratification, in that the church intend this, and the people consent. Lastly the judgment of Papists is cleare, that they putt no holinesse in the Cerem. instituted, you must place no holines in images, Concil. Trid. Sess. 25. By this which hath beene said, it is (as I think sufficiently manifested, that the differences betwixt all popish Cere. and ours, of worship, necessity, holines, and synfull omission, are vainely and without ground alledged by the Rej.
- 1Quod Cereligant conscientias per accidens propter ratificationem, quia ecclesia hoc intendit, & populus consentit▪ Antid. ad art. Paris. ar•. 25.Quod Cereligant cōscientias per accidēs propter ratificationem, quia ecclesia hoc intendit, & populus consentit▪ Antid. ad art. Paris. ar•. 25.