A19142:421
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
5. The second instance out of the same Parliament Records (saith the Rej.) blameth this in the Convocation, that it hath made the refusal of Subscription penal, with deprivation of mens free-hold. Which is very true, and due: but not that only; For the Parliament condemneth expressly all urging of Subscription above that appointed by the Statute of 13th. Eliz. which only concerneth confession o• the true Christian faith, and doctrine of the Sacraments ▪ Neither is their mentioning of free-hold so to be taken▪ as if they allowed the men should for refusal of othe• Subscription, be deprived of their Copy holds; bu• only as an exaggeration of the Prelates presumption▪ who do not fear, nor spare to violate the fundamental Laws, and Liberties of England, such as that is, fo• no man to be deprived of free-hold, without the Law of Parliament, and a Jury of 12. legal men.
5. The second instance out of the same Parliament Records (sayth the Rej.) blameth this in the Convocation, that it hath made the refusall of Subscription poenall, with deprivation of mens free-holde. Which is very true, and due: but not that onely; For the Parliament condemneth expresly all urging of Subscription above that appointed by the Statute of 13th. Eliz. which onely concerneth confession o• the true Christian faith, and doctrine of the Sacraments ▪ Neither is their mentioning of free-hold so to be taken▪ as if they allowed the men should for refusall of othe• Subscription, be deprived of their Copy holds; bu• onely as an exaggeration of the Prelates praesumption▪ who doe not feare, nor spare to vihlate the fundamentall Lawes, and Liberties of England, such as that is, fo• no man to be deprived of free-hold, without the Law of Parliament, and a Iury of 12. legall men.