A19142:556
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
10. About the Repl: his answer to a place cited ⟨p. 12⟩out of Calvin the Rejoinder observeth much irreligious way wardnesse, with falsehood, and three gross untruths, in one short sentence. Which it pleased him to note also in the Table of his principal or most observable Contents: the Replier found guilty of three gross untruths together. p. 15. This peal of terrible words make such a noise in the readers ears, that he can scarce hear, what may be spoken for the party accused. But if he will hearken a little, it shall be made plain unto him that hasty passion only (in reasons absence) made all this rattling sound.
10. About the Repl: his answer to a place cited ⟨p. 12⟩out of Calvin the Rejoynder observeth much irreligious way wardnesse, with falshood, and three grosse untruthes, in one short sentence. Whiche it pleased him to note also in the Table of his principall or most observable Contents: the Replier found guiltie of three grosse untruthes together. p. 15. This peal of terrible words make suche a noise in the readers ears, that he cā scarse hear, what may be spoken for the partie accused. But if he will hearken a litle, it shal be made plaine unto him that hastie passion onely (in reasons absence) made all this ratling sound.
The first wayward, false, irreligious, and gross untruth is, that the Def. should have dealt more plainly, if he had cited Bellarmine, and why (trow ye) is it so great a crime, for to say the Def. might have dealt more plainly? because (forsooth) no dealing could be more plain, then to set down the very words of Calvin, with the place, where they are to be found. Now be it so, yet it is not so heinous an offence to say some dealing, might be plainer then that which is most plain, but as the Secretaries and Proctors of our Prelates cour•s do in imitation of Criminal indictments (wherein always stand felonious etc.) aggravate every trifling accusation, and citation, especially those which concern a Bishop, as ungodly, irreligious, false etc. so must he that writeth, against any thing prejudicial to Praelats, secundum stylum Curiae, But the trueth is that any other mans words set down according to his meaning, is more plain dealing, then to set down Calvins, beside his intention.