A19142:590
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Other meaning I cannot gather either out of these words, or out of the Rejoinder his doctrine of worship, which was before distinctly weighed, in the head of Worship. Mr. Cartwrite's conjecture (as the Rejoinder calleth it) is the very same with that which he calleth ⟨p. 28⟩Calvins conceit. The Rejoinder his answer also is the same for substance, that it is true in matter• particularly determined by God, but not in matters of order and ceremony, of which God hath not determined particularly. The sense of which is, that we must depend upon God, so far as he hath determined particularly, but in other things, we must depend upon men, and in England, upon the Convocation house. But to depend upon God, and his mouth, being to follow only his determination and what sense then is this, you shall only follow Gods determination, in those things which he hath particularly determined, but if you please to do any thing in his worship, which he hath not determined particularly, you may therein depend upon whom you plea•e? For matter of Ceremony, enough hath been spoken before: and of order, we shall after dispute.
Other meaning I cannot gather eyther out of these words, or out of the Rejoynder his doctrine of worship, which was before distinctly weighed, in the head of Worship. Mr. Cartwrites conjecture (as the Rejoynder calleth it) is the very same with that which he calleth ⟨p. 28⟩Calvins conceit. The Rejoynder his answer also is the same for substance, that it is true in matter• particularly determined by God, but not in matters of order and ceremonie, of which God hath not determined particularly. The sense of which is, that we must depend upon God, so farr as he hath determined particularly, but in other things, we must depend upon men, and in England, upon the Convocation house. But to depend upon God, and his mouth, being to follow onely his determination and what sense then is this, you shall onely follow Gods determination, in those things which he hath particularly determined, but if you please to doe any thing in his wo•ship, which he hath not determined particularly, you may therin depende upon whom you plea•e? For matter of Ceremonie, enough hath beē spokē before: and of order, wee shall after dispute.