A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Now if he had attended unto the question, considering that it was only what Tertullian in this place meant by this phrase not permitted, and that his meaning for the word must be the same, with that immediately before opposed: Quod non prohibetur ultro permissum est, he would not have given that gloss, for then the meaning of this sentence must be: that which hath no particular word ⟨p. 32⟩against it, can have no reasons out of the word made against it. Such fustian is that clause of the Rejoinder, our meaning and his, are alike, and we hold our Ceremonies to be so perm•tted, and therefore not prohibited. So permitted is, by his interpretation, not to be prohibited by consequence, prohibited must needs be either the same, or else prohibited by particular word: if the former, then he saith thus: our Ceremonies are not prohibited by consequence: therefore they are not prohibited by consequence, if the later, then this is his saying: our Ceremonies are not forbidden by consequence only, therefore they are not by particular word forbidden. The former is no reason; the later neither is consequence, nor toucheth any question.

Now if he had attended unto the question, considering that it was onely what Tertullian in this place meant by this phrase not permitted, and that his meaning for the word must be the same, with that immediately before opposed: Quod non prohibetur ultro permissum est, he would not have given that glosse, for then the meaning of this sentence must be: that which hath no particular word ⟨p. 32⟩against it, can have no reasons out of the word made against it. Suche •ustian is that clause of the Rejoynder, our meaning and hìs, are alike, and wee hold our Ceremon•es to be so perm•tted, and therfor not prohibited. So permitted is, by his interpretation, not to be prohibited by consequence, prohibited must needs be ey•her the same, or else p•ohibited by particular word: if the former, then he sayth thus: our Ceremonies are not p•ohibited by consequence: therfor they are not prohibited by consequence, if the later, then this is his saying: our Ceremonies are not forbidden by consequence onely, therfor they are not by particular word forbidden. The former is no reason; the later neyther is consequence, nor toucheth any quaestion.