A19142:638
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Part › Chapter 1 › SECT. 15. Concerning Protestants arguing negatively from Scripture.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
(*Nihil tale a Christo aut factum, aut institutum. Ergo ne sapientiores nos ipso & Apostolis fore arbitremur.)
* There is no such thing by Christ, either done or instituted, therefore let us not deem our selves wiser then he or his Apostles.
* There is no suche thing by Christ, either done or instituted, therefore let us not deeme our selves wiser then he or his Apostles.
4. Another omission, whereof the Repl is accused, for which he is called a gentle man, is, that the Def. in the end of this Argument, recalleth the state of the question, distinguishing betwixt mere Ceremonies, & mixed, by mere meaning altogether indifferent, and by mixed, some way forbidden, All which (saith the Rejoinder) the gentle Replier passeth by. Now sure he might also him self have passed this by, with more credit of the Def.
4. Another omission, wherof the Repl is accused, for which he is called a gentle man, is, that the Def. in the ende of this Argumēt, recalleth the state of the question, distinguishing betwixt mere Ceremonies, & mixt, by mere meaning altogether indifferent, and by mixt, some way forbidden, All which (sayth the Rejoynder) the gentle Replier passeth by. Now sure he might also him self have passed this by, with more credit of the Def.