A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Lastly the Rejoinder himself when he would give a rule for distinguishing good Ceremonies from bad, useth to make this one, that they be free from opinion of merit etc. And yet he will not say that such opinions are proper to Ceremonies.

Lastly the Rejoynder himself when he would give a rule for distinguishing good Ceremonies from bad, useth to make this one, that they be free from opinion of merit etc. And yet he will not say that suche opinions are proper to Ceremonies.

3. H. I. is in the last place brought in, as not holding the rules of T. C. Which (were it true) is little material, or to the purpose. But what is noted out of H. I. repugnant? He enjoineth the same rules to be observed in the determining of mere Circumstances either Civill, or occasional, but denieth the Church to have any power of appointing Ceremonies merely Ecclesiastical. And this is in effect to take those rules away, removing the Ceremonies which should be framed by them.

3. H. I. is in the last place brought in, as not holding the rules of T. C. Whiche (were it true) is litle materiall, or to the purpose. But what is noted out of H. I. repugnant? He injoineth the same rules to be observed in the determining of mere Circumstances eyther Civill, or occasionall, but denieth the Churc•e to have any power of appointing Cerem•nies meerly Ecclesiasticall. And this is in effect to take those rules away, removing the Ceremonies which should be fram•d by them.

Nay rather this in effect, and cause both, to acknowledge the rules, and only to point out the true objects to be ruled by them, and to give warning of abusive objects which have crept in under the colours of those