A19142:662
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
This place is all the answer they give, or can give, to those that are wont to trouble them with a quo warranto.
This place is all the answer they give, or can give, to those that are wonte to trouble them with a quo warranto.
If this place then faileth them, or serveth not their turn, are not our Ceremonies confessed to be appointed without any warrant of the word, at least in the New Testament?
If this place then faileth them, or serveth not their turne, are not our Ceremonies confessed to be appointed without any warrant of the word, at least in the New Testament?
1. Now that it doeth not make to the purpose, it was first showed, from this, that the Defend. himself concludeth no more from thence, then that the Church may by virtue of this permission, ordain any Ceremonies that may be fit for the better serving of God. Which maketh nothing to the purpose, except first it be proved that God is better served with our Ceremonies, then without them. The Rejoinder here 1. denieth this to be his Conclusion, and yet they are his own words, & no other conclusion is mentioned by him, as appeareth in the Rejoinder it self, pag. 74. But by this (saith the Rejoinder) he undertakes to prove another thing. Let it be so, yet he must first prove this, which he immediately draweth out of the text, which he doeth not.
1. Now that it doeth not make to the purpose, it was first shewed, from this, that the Defend. himself concludeth no more from thence, then that the Churche may by vertue of this permission, ordaine any Ceremonies that may be fit for the better serving of God. Which maketh nothing to the purpose, except first it be proved that God is better served with our Ceremonies, then without them. The Rejoynder here 1. denieth this to be his Conclusion, and yet they are his owne wordes, & no other conclusion is mentioned by him, as appeareth in the Rejoynder it self, pag. 74. But by this (sayth the Rejoynder) hee undertakes to prove another thing. Let it be so, yet he must first prove this, which he immediately draweth out of the text, which he doeth not.