A19142:759
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
He spake of all not necessary not appointed by Christ: but yet he spake not of ours.
He spake of all not necessarie not appointed by Christ: but yet he spake not of ours.
This is as some should deny that rule which some logicians call de omni & de nullo, to hold in Ceremonies: or affirm that to be false of English Ceremonies, which is true of all Ceremonies. 2. When our Divines speak against Popish Ceremonies, the Rejoinder his ordinary answer is, that they speak of Ceremonies held necessary, and therefore not of such as ours. Now when Junius expressly speaketh of Ceremonies not necessary, the Rejoinder concludeth, that he could not mean ours or such like. How should any man speak, to put such a Rejoinder from having some thing to speak? 3. Junius said, that those Ceremonies are unlawfully appointed, which are not convenient to, or required by Order: Ergo (saith the Rejoinder.) he could not speak of such as ours are. And yet the same Rejoinder manud. pag. 33. confesseth our Ceremonies to be double or treble Ceremonies and those of order, to be only single. Neither could he ever yet find any fit place, to show our Ceremonies agreeable to order.
This is as some should denie that rule which some logicians call de omni & de nullo, to holde in Ceremonies: or affirme that to be false of English Ceremonies, which is true of all Ceremonies. 2. When our Divines speak against Popish Ceremonies, the Rejoynder his ordinarie answer is, that they speak of Ceremonies held necessarie, and therfore not of suche as ours. Now when Iunius expresly speaketh of Ceremonies not necessarie, the Rejoynder concludeth, that he could not meane ours or suche like. How should any man speake, to put suche a Rejoynder from having some thing to speak? 3. Iunius sayd, that those Ceremonies are unlawfully appointed, which are not convenient to, or required by Order: Ergo (sayth the Rejoynder.) he could not speak of suche as ours are. And yet the same Rejoynder manud. pag. 33. confesseth our Ceremonies to be double or treble Ceremonies and those of order, to be onely single. Neyther could he ever yet finde any fit place, to shew our Ceremonies agreeable to order.