A19142:763
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
5. Two things yet the Rejoinder noteth in the by: 1. Junius would not resist such things pertinaciously, as the Repl. doeth 2. Junius speaking against cladding Gods ordinances with the garments of humane Ceremonies, had another meaning, then the Def. p. 3. Rejoinder pag. 5. where he calleth such Ceremonies as ours, the garment of Religion: because by clothing Junius meant adorning and hiding of nakedness, but the Def. opposed garments to members of the body: and therefore the ⟨p. 93⟩Repl. need not by his marginal note have applied Junius his clothing to the Def. his garment. Now for the first of these, there is difference betwixt pervicacious contending, without reason and measure, which Junius modestly putteth from him, and that constant resistance which he himself teacheth here in this place, where he affirmeth that Christs sheep (even in such Ceremonial matter) will not nor ought to hear any voice but Christs. For this, he foreseeing that it would be accounted pervicacy, disclaimeth that, and yet doeth thoroughly resist. So would the Rep. if he may have leave: If not, I see not why he may not do the same thing, though he be censured for it, as Junius feared he should be.
5. Two thinges yet the Rejoynder noteth in the by: 1. Iunius would not resist suche thinges pertinaciously, as the Repl. doeth 2. Iunius speaking against cladding Gods ordinances with the garments of humane Ceremonies, had another meaning, then the Def. p. 3. Rejoynder pag. 5. where he calleth suche Ceremonies as ours, the garment of Religion: because by clothing Iunius meant adorning and hiding of nakednesse, but the Def. opposed garments to members of the bodie: and therfore the ⟨p. 93⟩Repl. need not by his marginall note have applied Iunius his clothing to the Def. his garment. Now for the first of these, ther is difference betwixt pervicatious contending, without reason and measure, which Iunius modesly putteth from him, and that constant restistance which he himself teacheth here in this place, where he affirmeth that Christs sheep (even in suche Ceremoniall matter) will not nor ought to hear any voice but Christs. For this, hee foreseeing that it would be accounted pervicacie, disclaimeth that, and yet doeth thoroughlie resist. So would the Rep. if he may have leave: If not, I see not why he may not doe the same thinge, though he be censured for it, as Iunius feared hee should be.