A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

Thus much for the Rejoinder apart. Now to the Def. 1. His Argument is rejected, as supposing, all Circumstances to be of like nature with these in controversy. No (saith the Rejoinder) but only that one would like one thing, and one another. But I say yes, or else he cannot argue from one to the other. For what consequence is in this: Men may determine of simple circumstances for order and decency: Ergo they may ordain double, treble, sacred, significant Ceremonies proper to Religion? beside he nameth in his supposition Festival days.

Thus much for the Rejoynder apart. Now to the Def. 1. His Argument is rejected, as supposing, all Circumstances to be of like nature with these in controversie. No (sayth the Rejoynder) but onely that one would like one thing, and one another. But I say yes, or else he cannot argue from one to the other. For what consequence is in this: Men may determine of simple circumstances for order and decencie: Ergo they may ordeyne double, treble, sacred, significant Ceremonies proper to Religion? beside he nameth in his supposition Festivall days.

2. The second fault, found in the Def. his argument was, it supposeth all circumstances to be of institution. No, saith the Rejoinder again. Let him therefore put ordaining out of the Sum which he hath made of the Def. his reason, and confess also, that this reason maketh nothing for mens instituting of Ceremonies.

2. The second fault, found in the Def. his argument was, it supposeth all circumstances to be of institution. No, sayth the Rejoynder againe. Let him therfore put ordeyning out of the Summe which he hath made of the Def. his reason, and confesse also, that this reason maketh nothing for mens instituting of Ceremonies.