A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

2. Because the Def. in his distinction, placed Edification ⟨p. 113⟩only on the part of Accidental worship, that was noted as a flaw. To which the Rejoinder answereth, that essential parts of worship serve also to edification, and worship of themselves. But 1. this can be no more gathered out of the Def. his words, then that all essential worship serveth for decency: for he placeth these two together, as ends of accidental parts of worship, that they serve for decorum, and edification. 2. This is but to help a broken leg, with a broken crutch. For essential worship tending to worship of it self, is as broken a phrase, as the former was a distinction.

2. Because the Def. in his distinction, placed Edification ⟨p. 113⟩onely on the part of Accidentall worship, that was noted as a flaw. To which the Rejoynder answereth, that essentiall parts of worship serve also to edification, and worship of themselves. But 1. this can be no more gathered out of the Def. his words, then that all essentiall worship serveth for decencie: for he placeth these two together, as endes of accidentall parts of worship, that they serve for decorum, and edification. 2. This is but to help a broken legge, with a broken crutche. For essē tiall worship tending to worship of it self, is as broken a phraze, as the former was a distinction.

3. It was noted also, that the Def. confounded appurtenances, and parts of worship. The Rejoinder answereth, that those things which are appurtenances only in proper, simple, and strict sense, are parts of worship improperly, and in a sort. So in deed at the University, among Sophisters impropriè, laxè, modo quodam, quodammodo, are wont to help at a dead lift. But that which is only an appurtenance of worship, is no more worship, then a Bishops Rochet, is a Bishop.

3. It was noted also, that the Def. confounded appurtenances, and parts of worship. The Rejoynder answereth, that those thinges which are appurtenances onely in proper, simple, and strict sense, are partes of worship improperly, and in a sorte. So in deed at the Vniversitie, amonge Sophisters impropriè, laxè, modo quodam, quodammodo, are woont to helpe at a dead lift. But that which is onely an appurtenance of worship, is no more worship, then a Bishops Rochet, is a Bishop.