A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

But I wonder from what good Divine he ever learned this assertion? The Papists are ordinarily charged by us for teaching, and practising of will-worship: yet diverse of them are ashamed to profess the defence of such a monster, in plain terms. ESTIVS upon the Epist. to the Col. Cap. 3. ult. disputing against some one ⟨p. 150⟩or two Jesuits, that had been forced to let fall such a speech, saith of them, as we say of the Rejoynder, Docere non poterunt [Greek or Hebrew] usquam accipi in bono. They can never show, that will-worship is taken in good sense, […] wed of and not condemned. All our Divines might here be opposed to these two Doctors opinions. But it shall suffice, to allege only two for the contrary, and they are Ursin, and Zanchie, whose authority are so much urged by the Def. and Rejoynd. in this section, Ursin in the place quoted by the Def. upon the 2. Commandment saith thus: All feigned worship is forbidden: all worship which is not of God, ¹but set up by men, when worship or honour is feigned to be done to the true God, in some work which he hath not enjoined. Zanchie also upon the same Come. q. 4. thus: We may not worship God with any other worship (though it be in the kind of external and Ceremonial worship) then with that which he hath required in the holy Scriptures to be worshipped of us by. 3. Concerning the examples,² which are here brought forth of warrantable will-worship, free-will offerings, vows, and kneeling in public prayer, enough hath been answered before. Yet briefly again free-will offerings were only to be made of such things as were manifestly known to be prescribed by Gods revealed will: and so not the offering, but undertaking of it, at such a time, or in such a measure, was left unto the free choice of men, according to occasion.

But I wonder from what good Divine he ever learned this assertion? The Papists are ordinarily charged by us for teaching, and practising of will-worship: yet diverse of them are ashamed to professe the defense of suche a monster, in plaine termes. ESTIVS upon the Epist. to the Col. Cap. 3. ult. disputing against some one ⟨p. 150⟩or two Iesuites, that had been forced to let fall suche a speache, sayth of them, as we say of the Rejoynder, Docere non poterunt usquam accipi in bono. They can never shew, that will-worship is taken in good sense, wed of and not condemned. All our Divines might here be opposed to these two Doctors opinions. But it shall suffize, to allege onely two for the contrarie, and they are Vrsin, and Zanchie, whose authoritie are so muche urged by the Def. and Rejoynd. in this section, Vrsin in the place quoted by the Def. upon the 2. Commandement sayth thus: All fained worship is forbidden: all worship which is not of God,