A19142:912
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
4. The Rejoynd. raiseth up a report, without showing from whom he received it, that Mr. Bradshaw reversed his own opinion of things indifferent. Which until it be some other way confirmed, then by an adversaries bare telling, and that in a humour of disgracing his person, it must be accounted a mere tale. But he had good reason to reverse his opinion (saith the Rejoinder) because against all reason and sense, he resolved that there is nothing indifferent.
4. The Rejoynd. raiseth up a report, without shewing from whome he receyved it, that Mr. Bradshaw reversed his owne opinion of thinges indifferent. Which untill it be some other way confirmed, then by an adversaries bare telling, and that in a humour of disgracing his person, it must be accounted a mere tale. But he had good reason to reverse his opinion (sayth the Rejoynder) because against all reason and sense, he resolved that ther is nothing indifferent.
If this were so as it is related, reason would persuade to some recantation. But it is only the Rejoinder his telling again, without any show of proof.
If this were so as it is related, reason would perswade to some recantation. But it is onely the Rejoynder his telling againe, without any shew of proof.
I, for my part, can find no such words in Mr. Bradshaw his treatise, neither any thing from whence such a raw sentence may be reasonably collected. He ⟨p. 162⟩concludeth in deed cap. 3. that there is no absolute indifferent thing. 1. e. every way, as well in order of nature, as of morality. He affirmed also cap. 7. there is nothing actually indifferent, which is not potentially good or evil, and cap. 8. there is no action of mans will so indifferent, but the doing thereof, by some circumstances, may be evil. There is no action that a man can do, by the power of his will, that is merely and absolutely indifferent. These passages come the nearest to that which is here fathered upon the treatise: in all which this crudity appeareth not: there is nothing indifferent. Nay the harshest of these assertions, may be found not only in little Pamphlets made by Carpenters boys, against learning and sense, but in great volumes, written by those that go for very learned, and sensible in such matters as this is. Thomas Aquinas, in the great book, called his Sum, prima secundae, q. 18. ar. 9. hath this conclusion: