A19142:917
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
First we are told here, that it is essential to proper essential worship, be it true or false, that it tend of it self, and immediately, to the honour of God. So then we have the common nature of proper worship, as it is common to true and false worship. Now add unto this that which is added, pag. 125.126. that this worship, if it be required of God, is true, if not, false. Now this being granted, our whole Argument is granted, so far as it concerneth proper worship. For by this confession of the Rejoinder it is plain, that the institution of God doeth not make a thing proper worship, but only true proper worship, and the want of it doeth make proper worship false.
First we are tould here, that it is essentiall to proper essentiall worship, be it true or false, that it tende of it self, and immediatly, to the honour of God. So then we have the common nature of proper worship, as it is common to true and false worship. Now adde unto this that which is added, pag. 125.126. that this worship, if it be required of God, is true, if not, false. Now this being granted, our wholle Argument is granted, so farre as it concerneth proper worship. For by this confession of the Rejoynder it is plaine, that the institution of God doeth not make a thing proper worship, but onely true proper worship, and the want of it doeth make proper worship false.
And this is all that we intend in this Argument, ⟨p. 164⟩for which also we are twitted with new learning by the Def. pag. 185. where also he affirmeth that Gods institution doeth distinguish essential worship from accidental, and therein he is maintained by the Rejoinder as by and by we shall see.
And this is all that we intende in this Argument, ⟨p. 164⟩for which also we are twitted with new learning by the Def. pag. 185. where also he affirmeth that Gods institution doeth distinguishe essentiall worship from accidentall, and therin he is mainteyned by the Rejoynder as by and by we shall see.