A19142:919
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But how can these things stand together Gods institution is first the specific difference, whereby essential worship is distinguished from accidental, and yet the specific difference also whereby true essential worship is distinguished from false? Can any one thing be a specific form of diverse effects, or difference of diverse subordinate things, such as essential, and true essential worship are? Can there be ore and the same difference, betwixt a living and a lifeless creature, and also betwixt a reasonable and unreasonable living creature.
But how can these thinges stand together Gods institution is first the specificall difference, wherby essentiall worship is distinguished from accidentall, and yet the specificall difference also wherby true essentiall worship is distinguished from false? Can any one thing be a specificall forme of diverse effects, or difference of diverse subordinate thinges, suche as essentiall, and true essentiall worship are? Can ther be ore and the same difference, betwixt a living and a livelesse creature, and also betwixt a reasonable and unreasonable living creature.
It is in the second place observable, how the Rejoinder seeketh to convey, or (to speak plainly) steal away from us, that which he had given. Divines (saith he) do distinguish proper worship, from that which is after a sort so called, by immediate end, and per se.
It is in the second place observable, how the Rejoynder seeketh to convey, or (to speak playnely) steal away from us, that which he had given. Divines (sayth he) doe distinguish proper worsh•p, from that which is after a sort so called, by immediat ende, and per se.
Be it so: this doeth not contradict any thing here in question: and it hath been expounded before, in the head of worship. The Divines of Saxony, and Wittenberg, Ursin also, and Zanchie are alleged for the same purpose, 1. e. nothing to the purpose, Of Ursin and Zanchie, enough hath been spoken in the former section. As for the other, see how they