A19142:93
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Which is such a mere put-of, & so unbeseeming the skill of a Logical disputer, much more the champion-like confidence of Doctor Burgess, that had not his heart secretly misgiven him, in this seeming bravado, such an expression would never have fallen from his pen.
VVhich is such a meer put-of, & so unbeseeming the skill of a Logicall disputer, much more the champion-like confidence of Doctor Burgesse, that had not his heart secretly misgiven him, in this seeming bravado, such an expression vvould never haue falne from his penn.
For let any rational man be judge in this case. Are not Logical arguments plainly expressed in a continued discourse, & by a Logician easily collected? & what needs a reducing to a form then?
For let any rationall man be judge in this case. Are not Logicall arguments playnly expressed in a continued discourse, & by a Logician easily collected? & vvhat needs a reducing to a forme then?