A19142:941
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. The reason which he bringeth, is only from the subdivision of true worship. But that doeth not hinder a superdivision, or aequidivision, into common, and special, Ecclesiastical, and domesticall, as Mr. Perkins divideth in the place before cited. 3. That division into substantial, and accidental, cannot possibly (with any reason) be more applied unto true then false worship, except the Rejoinder will say, that no false worship is either substantial, or accidental.
2. The reason which he bringeth, is onely from the subdivision of true worship. But that doeth not hinder a superdivision, or aequidivision, into common, and speciall, Ecclesiasticall, and domesticall, as Mr. Perkinse divideth in the place before cited. 3. That division into substantiall, and accidentall, cannot possiblie (with any reason) be more applied unto true then false worship, except the Rejoynder will say, that no false worship is eyther substantiall, or accidentall.
The second answer to the former instance (belonging to all those by the Rejoinder adjoined) is, that i• before the law, the same worship had been performed, with the same mind, that is, in the same manner, and to the same end, it had been as essential worship, as after, though not so true, and lawful.
The seconde answer to the former instance (belonging to all those by the Rejoynder adjoined) is, that i• before the law, the same worship had been performed, with the same minde, that is, in the same manner, and to the same ende, it had been as essentiall worship, as after, though not so true, and lawfull.
The Rejoinder here first, observeth a contradiction to that which was formerly said sect. 6. worship doeth not vary, according to mens opinion. But if he understand the matter well, he shall find both sayings well to agree. For though the want of some opinion doeth not vary the nature of worship, so as that the absence of this or that opinion, doeth make any external worship, not essential: and yet it doeth so vary the nature of worship, as that the presence of some opinion, doeth (as an efficient, not as a formal cause) make some external