A19142:960
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Neither is there any more holiness in one, then in the other, if both be only significative.
Neyther is ther any more holinesse in one, then in the other, if both be onely significative.
The Repl. further affirmed, that Mr. Hooker spoke of reverence to be signified towards the Ceremonies. To which is rejoined I know not what. But let Mr. Hookers words, going before those nakedly cited by the Def. and Rejoinder, be considered. The wise man could not mention so much as the garments of Holiness, but with singular reverence, and it will be evident, whereto he required reverence.
The Repl. further affirmed, that Mr. Hooker spoke of reverence to be signified towards the Ceremonies. To which is rejoined I know not what. But let Mr. Hookers words, goeing before those nakedly cited by the Def. and Rejoynder, be considered. The wise man could not mention so muche as the garments of Holinesse, but with singul•r reverence, and it will be evident, wherto he required reverence.
In the last place, Mr. Hookers opinion is slighted, as private. Whereas all know, that he is in our Ceremonial controversies, of as public note, and approbation, as Bellarmine in any Popish.
In the last place, Mr. Hookers opinion is slighted, as privat. Wheras all know, that he is in our Ceremoniall controversies, of as publicke note, and approbation, as Bellamine in any Popish.