A19563:2205
An answerAn aunsvvere
An answer by the Reverend Father in God Thomas Archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England and metropolitan, unto a crafty and sophistical cavillation, devised by Stephen Gardiner Doctor of Law, late Bishop of Winchester against the true and godly doctrine of the most holy sacrament, of the body and blood of our saviour Jesus Christ Wherein is also, as occasion serveth, answered such places of the book of Doct. Richard Smith, as may seem any thing worthy the answering. Here is also the true copy of the book written, and in open court delivered, by D. Stephen Gardiner ...An aunsvvere by the Reuerend Father in God Thomas Archbyshop of Canterbury, primate of all England and metropolitane, vnto a craftie and sophisticall cauillation, deuised by Stephen Gardiner Doctour of Law, late Byshop of Winchester agaynst the true and godly doctrine of the most holy sacrament, of the body and bloud of our sauiour Iesu Christ Wherein is also, as occasion serueth, aunswered such places of the booke of Doct. Richard Smith, as may seeme any thyng worthy the aunsweryng. Here is also the true copy of the booke written, and in open court deliuered, by D. Stephen Gardiner ...
London: printed by John Daye, 1580London: printed by Iohn Daye, 1580
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
He saith, we believe simply, that Christs body is naturally and corporally in the Sacrament, without drawing away his accidences or adding, pag. 353. lin. 1.
He sayth, we beleue simply, that Christes body is naturally and corporally in the Sacrament, wihout drawyng away his accidences or addyng, pag. 353. lin. 1.
Smith saith, we say that Christs body is in the Sacrament against nature withal his qualities and accidents. fol. 105.
Smith sayth, we say that Christes body is in the Sacrament agaynst nature withall his qualities and accidentes. fol. 105.
He saith, that Gods works be all seemliness without confusion, although he can not locally distinct Christs head from his foot, nor his legs from his arms, pag. 70. lin. 27.
He sayth, that Gods workes be all seemelynes without confusion, although he cā not locally distinct Christes head frō his foote, nor his legges from his armes, pag. 70. lin. 27.
Other say, that Christs head and foot and other parts be not in deed locally distinct in the Sacrament, but be so confounded, that where soever one is, there be all the rest. They teach that the body of Christ is made of bread, he saith, it was never so taught, pag. 79. lin. 6. &c.