An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of…An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of…

First, so much he must necessarily acknowledge, that he may decline the censure of all learned men, in case he should do otherwise. For even his professed adversaries will do so much. And though all men should be so possessed with a spirit of envy that they would hide and blemish his worth; yet his works will praise him to posterity, which we will distribute under their ⟨p. 80⟩several heads, thus. Besides the book mentioned by the author, & his Demonstratio logica; his Polemical treatises, which, are extant, are, 1. that sinewous work, Bellarminus enervatus, where the volumes of that daring Jesuit, and Cardinal are so concisely answered, as if Homers Iliads were in a nutshell, and that exact piece in the Arminian controversies, his Coronis, besides those other disputes, viz, his Antisynodalia, contra Grevinchovium, his 1 and 2 Manuduction, his Reply, and Triplication. 2. His systematical treatises, his Catechism (which I find mentioned, but have not seen it) that worthy work worthily called Medulla Theologiae, the Marrow of Divinity, and that practical institution (wherein he exceedeth not only Pontificians and Lutherans handling that argument, but also his own guide in that work, who died before he could finish it, famous Mr. Perkins) his Cases of conscience. 3. His exegetical treatises, viz his Analysis upon the whole book of the Psalms (which he lived not to perfect, to his mind) his notes upon the 1. & 2. Epistles of Peter, and upon the catechetical heads.

First, so much he must necessarily acknowledge, that he may decline the censure of all learned men, in case he should doe otherwise. For evē his professed adversaries will doe so much. And though all men should be so possessed with a spirit of envy that they would hide and blemish his worth; yet his workes will prayse him to posterity, which we will distribute under theyr ⟨p. 80⟩severall heads, thus. Besides the booke mentioned by the authour, & his Demonstratio logica; his Polemicall treatises, which, are extant, are, 1. that sinewous worke, Bellarminus enervatus, where the volumes of that daring Iesuit, and Cardinall are so concisely answered, as if Homers Iliads were in a nutshell, and that exact peece in the Arminian controversies, his Coronis, besides those other disputes, viz, his Antisynodalia, contrā Grevinchovium, his 1 and 2 Manuduction, his Reply, and Triplication. 2. His systematicall treatises, his Catechisme (which I find mentioned, but have not seene it) that worthy worke worthily called Medulla Theologiae, the Marrow of Divinity, and that practicall institution (wherein he exceedeth not only Pontificians and Lutherans handling that argument, but also his owne guide in that worke, who died before he could finish it, famous Mr. Perkins) his Cases of conscience. 3. His exegeticall treatises, viz his Analysis upon the wholl booke of the Psalmes (which he lived not to perfect, to his mind) his noates upon the 1. & 2. Epistles of Peter, and upon the catecheticall heads.