A19884:710
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of…An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of…
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his writings. By John Davenport BD.An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his wrightings. By Iohn Davenporte BD.
Rotterdam: printed by Isaac van Waesberghe, 1636Rotterdam: printed by Isaack van Waesberghe, 1636
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The answer to the 18. Section examined, concerning another Act of accommodation for my satisfaction.
The Answerer beginneth this Section with a misreport of my withdrawing my consent, which, he saith, I had formerly given, whereas the truth is, that, from first to last, I was of the same judgment against this unwarrantable custom, and so expressed my self, without any alteration.
THe Answerer beginneth this Section with a misreport of my withdrawing my consent, which, he sayth, I had formerly given, whereas the truth is, that, from first to last, I was of the same judgment against this unwarrantable custom, and so expressed my selfe, without any alteration.
The passages in the Consistory, the 11. of Feb. 1634. the Answerer reporteth some what disorderly, in that he beginneth with that which was last, and maketh the testification of the Elders to follow that Act, which went before it, whereby the right understanding of things is hindered. For, after that private discourse, before mentioned, had passed between him and me, and after some other speeches in the Consistory, and ⟨p. 190⟩after I had walked forth, at their entreaty, a great while, that they might privately consult, being called in again to hear the issue, whereunto matters were brought, I found that the order, spoken of in the 13. Section, was again renewed and enlarged, with this addition, that the Elders and Deacons likewise promised to send such to me as should come to them. Which was as much as just nothing. For, the same objections which were made against the same offer made on the behalf of the Answerer and of the Coster, in the 13. Section, are of force against this also.