A19884:741
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of…An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of…
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his writings. By John Davenport BD.An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his wrightings. By Iohn Davenporte BD.
Rotterdam: printed by Isaac van Waesberghe, 1636Rotterdam: printed by Isaack van Waesberghe, 1636
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
His Answer to the 22. Section examined, containing a writing, first left with a friend or two, and afterwards, without my consent or knowledge, printed
His Answer to the 22. Section examined, containing a wrighting, first left with a freind or two, and afterwards, without my consent or knowledge, printed
MY defence of Answering his untrue reports, in my writing, and of having it in the hands of one or two friends, that might speak in the cause of the dumb, & maintain mine innocency, in my absence, the Reader shall find in my reply to the second Section. Now, the cavils which are to be found in this Section against that writing are to be examined. First. It is an injury to call that writing injurious which was a necessary declaration of the truth against slanders, which were, first secretly spread abroad by him, in private speech, afterwards, by a large letter which he sent to his friend at N. in England, & now are by him scandalously published, not only against me (ego enim non sum tanti) but against men of eminent worth and note, both living and dead.
MY defence of Answering his untrue reports, in my wrighting, and of having it in the hands of one or two freinds, that might speake in the cause of the dumbe, & maintaine myne innocency, in my absence, the Reader shall find in my reply to the second Section. Now, the cavills which are to be found in this Section against that wrighting are to be examined. First. It is an injury to call that wrighting injurious which was a necessary declaration of the truth against slanders, which were, first secretly spread abroad by him, in private speech, afterwards, by a large letter which he sent to his frend at N. in England, & now are by him scandalously published, not only against me (ego enim non sum tanti) but against men of eminent worth and noate, both living and dead.