A19884:852
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of…An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of…
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his writings. By John Davenport BD.An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his wrightings. By Iohn Davenporte BD.
Rotterdam: printed by Isaac van Waesberghe, 1636Rotterdam: printed by Isaack van Waesberghe, 1636
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The 28. Section examined.
IN this, and the three following Sections, they bring proofs of the justness of their complaint of his subjecting the Church under an undue power of the Classis. Their first proof is,1 his giving them power to keep out such men as he would have kept out, though they abhorred all heresy and Schism. And they instance in Mr. H: and me, which is aggravated. 1. by the primary agent, he, viz the Answerer. 2. by the innocency of the persons injured, ⟨p. 244⟩they being such as abhor all heresy and schism &c. 3. by the Answerers partial carriage, he would have had other, that, to this day, hold the same opinion.
IN this, and the three following Sections, they bring proofes of the justnes of their complaint of his subjecting the Church under an undue power of the Classis. Their first proofe is,1 his giving them power to keepe out such men as he would have kept out, though they abhorred all haeresy and Schysme. And they instance in Mr. H: and me, which is aggravated. 1. by the primary agent, he, viz the Answerer. 2. by the innocency of the persons injuryed, ⟨p. 244⟩they being such as abhor all haeresy and schysme &c. 3. by the Answerers partiall carriage, he would have had other, that, to this day, hold the same opinion.
- 11. Proof.1. Proofe.