Replyer.
Repliers writings unjustly called complaints. 10. 32
Replyer unjustly charged for nourishing contention. 15. 8
Replyer vindicated about a writing left by him for which the Answerer blames him. 23. 28. & 99. 2.
Justified in the matter of the writing. 201
4 things in the Repliers defence about his writing considerable. 23. 29.
Replyer freed from a 4fold charge laid upon him about his industry in keeping the Church together. 25. 13
Repliers writing sent to the Classis vindicated from the imputation of the Answerer. 33. 18
Replyer defended about faults in his writing. 72. 16
Replyer vindicated from the cavil of the Answerer about the word Always. 96. 15.
Replyer justified about his coming over to Amsterdam. 101. 6
About an authentic testimony which he is charged to have wanted. 102. 20
About the resignation of his Pastoral charge. 106. 8
Concerning his knowing of differences. 112. 8
Concerning his intention of coming over but for 3 or 4 months, and seeking of the place. 112 24
Replyer justified about writing divers conferences, which he had with the Answerer. 124, 1
Why the Replyer rested not in the judgement of the 5 Dutch Ministers about promiscuous Baptising. 174. 4
Replyer vindicated about his falsely supposed consenting to the writing of the 5 Dutch Ministers.
And from an accusation of withdrawing his consent. 187. 21
Replyer cleared concerning his pretended preaching in a private house. 197. 1. and 275. 20
Cleared from fault in desisting from it. 277. 22
Replyer cleared about his journeying out of town before the Sacrament. 200. 24
Replyer justified in his three writings. 202. 26
Replyer freed from the Answerers quarrelling at these words he did not desire me. 204. 27
Repliers opinion concerning the Classis the same with Dr. Ames. 224. 36
Replyer cleared from Schism. 248. 32.
Repliers judgement concerning the trueness of Churches, expressed in Dr. Ames words. 281 19.
Repliers opinion against promiscuous ⟨image 15⟩baptising, not built upon grounds of separation. 280. 20
Of the right by which the Replyer did communicate in the Lords Supper. 288. 20
Replyer refuteth not himself, when he professeth readiness to baptise their infants who have membership elsewhere. 292. 34
Replyer.
Replyers writings unjustly called complaints. 10. 32
Replyer unjustly charged for nourishing contention. 15. 8
Replyer vindicated about a writing left by him for which the Answerer blames him. 23. 28. & 99. 2.
Iustified in the matter of the writing. 201
4 things in the Replyers defense about his writing considerable. 23. 29.
Replyer freed frō a 4fold charge layd upon him about his industry in keeping the Church together. 25. 13
Replyers writing sent to the Classis vindicated from the imputation of the Answerer. 33. 18
Replyer defended about faults in his writing. 72. 16
Replyer vindicated from the cavill of the Answerer about the word Alwayes. 96. 15.
Replyer justified about his coming over to Amsterdam. 101. 6
About an authentick testimony which he is charged to have wanted. 102. 20
About the resignatiō of his Pastorall charge. 106. 8
Concerning his knowing of differences. 112. 8
Concerning his intention of comming over but for 3 or 4 monethes, and seeking of the place. 112 24
Replyer justified about writing divers conferences, which hee had with the Answerer. 124, 1
Why the Replyer rested not in the judgement of the 5 Dutch Ministers about promiscuous Baptising. 174. 4
Replyer vindicated about his falsely supposed consenting to the writing of the 5 Dutch Ministers.
And frō an accusation of withdrawing his consent. 187. 21
Replyer cleared concerning his pretended preaching in a private house. 197. 1. and 275. 20
Cleared from fault in desisting from it. 277. 22
Replyer cleared about his journeying out of towne before the Sacrament. 200. 24
Replyer justified in his three writings. 202. 26
Replyer freed from the Answerers quarelling at these words he did not desire me. 204. 27
Replyers opinion concerning the Classis the same with Dr. Ames. 224. 36
Replyer cleared from Scisme. 248. 32.
Replyers judgement concerning the truenesse of Churches, expressed in Dr. Ames words. 281 19.
Replyers opinion against promiscuous ⟨image 15⟩baptising, not built upon grounds of separation. 280. 20
Of the right by which the Replyer did communicate in the Lords Supper. 288. 20
Replyer refuteth not himselfe, when hee professeth readinesse to baptise their infāts who have membership elsewhere. 292. 34
