A19884:96
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of…An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of…
An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his writings. By John Davenport BD.An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of VV.B. Also an answer to Mr. I.D. touching his report of some passages. His allegation of Scriptures against the baptising of some kind of infants. His protestation about the publishing of his wrightings. By Iohn Davenporte BD.
Rotterdam: printed by Isaac van Waesberghe, 1636Rotterdam: printed by Isaack van Waesberghe, 1636
Index: A Table added by a Friend, wherein the Reader (for his better understanding) is to take…
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Provocation. Threefold Provocation added unjustly. 325. 1
Provocation. Threefold Provocatiō added unjustly. 325. 1
Quaere. Threefold Quaere in the Protestation, with the Answerers observations reviewed. 322. 4
Reformation. As Reformation increased the right of the people more pleaded for. 41. 36
Reply. A Reply upon the 4 answerers which the Answerer calls his comforts. 34. 26
Reply. A Reply upon the 4 answerers which the Answerer calles his comforts. 34. 26
Replyer. Repliers writings unjustly called complaints. 10. 32 Replyer unjustly charged for nourishing contention. 15. 8 Replyer vindicated about a writing left by him for which the Answerer blames him. 23. 28. & 99. 2. Justified in the matter of the writing. 201 4 things in the Repliers defence about his writing considerable. 23. 29. Replyer freed from a 4fold charge laid upon him about his industry in keeping the Church together. 25. 13 Repliers writing sent to the Classis vindicated from the imputation of the Answerer. 33. 18 Replyer defended about faults in his writing. 72. 16 Replyer vindicated from the cavil of the Answerer about the word Always. 96. 15. Replyer justified about his coming over to Amsterdam. 101. 6 About an authentic testimony which he is charged to have wanted. 102. 20 About the resignation of his Pastoral charge. 106. 8 Concerning his knowing of differences. 112. 8 Concerning his intention of coming over but for 3 or 4 months, and seeking of the place. 112 24 Replyer justified about writing divers conferences, which he had with the Answerer. 124, 1 Why the Replyer rested not in the judgement of the 5 Dutch Ministers about promiscuous Baptising. 174. 4 Replyer vindicated about his falsely supposed consenting to the writing of the 5 Dutch Ministers. And from an accusation of withdrawing his consent. 187. 21 Replyer cleared concerning his pretended preaching in a private house. 197. 1. and 275. 20 Cleared from fault in desisting from it. 277. 22 Replyer cleared about his journeying out of town before the Sacrament. 200. 24 Replyer justified in his three writings. 202. 26 Replyer freed from the Answerers quarrelling at these words he did not desire me. 204. 27 Repliers opinion concerning the Classis the same with Dr. Ames. 224. 36 Replyer cleared from Schism. 248. 32. Repliers judgement concerning the trueness of Churches, expressed in Dr. Ames words. 281 19. Repliers opinion against promiscuous