An apologetical reply to a book called an answer to the unjust complaint of…An apologeticall reply to a booke called an ansvver to the unjust complaint of…

In his sixth answer he would persuade the Reader that the Church did not desire me, after this difference, which is contrary to the professions of persons of all sorts, except Th. All.

What he saith in the 7, 8, 9, & 10 answers hath been examined before.

What he sayth in the 7, 8, 9, & 10 answers hath bene examined before.

The last passage, in this Sect: concerneth the preaching and prophesying of Ja: Cr: and Tho. Flet. which is elsewhere also repeated. Whereunto I am content, at the importunity of one of them,¹ (viz Ja: Cr.) to say some thing. Wherefore, passing by his scornful manner of naming them, which is very usual with him (though it better became Julian the Pelagian then the Answerer) I will only relate the answer which I received from him in writing, contracting it thus. 1. That he never read and applied Scripture, at any meeting, out of his own house. 2. That in his own family, he remembereth not that ever there were, in any private Religious exercise, above 5 or 6 persons, of other families, at one time. 3. That he hath not had such meetings above 5 or 6 times, in 8 or 9 years. 4. That he remembereth not that any one hath been at any such duty in his family, these 4 or 5 years past, at least, except some allowed minister were there present. 5. That when they did meet, he did not preach, but read the Answerers, or some others men labours. 6. That the Answerer never admonished him of any fault herein privately, nor did he ever hear that it was disliked, till the Answerer girded at such meeting, in a sermon, 3 or 4 years since. 7. That when he saw that the Answerer had wronged him in print, by an untrue report of these matters, he went to his house to convince him privately thereof, but departed thence without satisfaction. 8. That a few days after, as he heard, the Answerer sought for witnesses, and found 2. (as it was said) Ja. Cr. spake