A23636:276
The principles of the Protestant religion maintained, and churches of New-England, in the profession…
The principles of the Protestant religion maintained, and churches of New-England, in the profession and exercise thereof defended against all the calumnies of one George Keith, a Quaker, in a book lately published at Pennsylvania, to undermine them both / by the ministers of the Gospel in Boston.The principles of the Protestant religion maintained, and churches of New-England, in the profession and exercise thereof defended against all the calumnies of one George Keith, a Quaker, in a book lately published at Pensilvania, to undermine them both / by the ministers of the Gospel in Boston.
printed by Richard Pierce, 1690
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. it was not in our power to grant it ⟨p. 155⟩him, without laying our selves obnoxious to the then Government, who had expressly forbidden the people to take liberty of any public Meeting together on any occasion on the week-days, besides the usual Lectures.
1. it was not in our power to grant it ⟨p. 155⟩him, without laying our selves obnoxious to the then Government, who had expresly forbidden the people to take liberty of any publique Meeting together on any occasion on the week-days, besides the usual Lectures.
2. We knew none of our Hearers that had any scruple on their minds about any of those Truths which he charged with falsehood, but believed them firmly, as far as we had any knowledge, and therefore to dispute them for their sakes, was altogether needless.
3. We knew (partly because he was a Quaker, partly by the reports of his managing himself elsewhere, partly by his first Article of his Charges) that there would be no holding of him to any Law or Rule of Disputation, but he would bring all to his Revelations, and therefore the whole must needs issue in a tumultuous Brangle.
3. We knew (partly because he was a Quaker, partly by the reports of his managing himself elsewhere, partly by his first Article of his Charges) that there would be no holding of him to any Law or Rule of Disputation, but he would bring all to his Revelations, and therefore the whole must needs issue in a tumuluous Brangle.