An analytical exposition of both the epistles of the Apostle Peter illustratedAn analyticall exposition of both the epistles of the Apostle Peter illustrated

Ans. 2. He doth not here speak of Christ properly, as he is Redeemer, nor of the redemption of his blood, but of that right, whereby masters challenge their servants, as having bought them; which may be thus showed: 1. Here is no mention of Christ as being Lord properly, but Master. For in the Greek it is [Greek or Hebrew], which is properly, a Master in respect of a servant, not [Greek or Hebrew], Lord. And these two names are clearly distinguished, Jude v. 4. where the same thing is spoken of the same false teachers: there they are said to deny their Dominum & herum Lord and master; although he may be called their Herus, Master, he is not properly called their Dominus, Lord. Then again, the Lord is not said to have redeemed all men, but only to have bought them: now although the word [Greek or Hebrew], to buy, be sometimes used in the same sense that the other is, yet it is not always so.

Ans. 2. He doth not here speak of Christ properly, as he is Redeemer, nor of the redemption of his blood, but of that right, whereby masters chalenge their servants, as having bought them; which may be thus shewed: 1. Here is no mention of Christ as being Lord properly, but Master. For in the Greek it is 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, which is properly, a Master in respect of a servant, not 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, Lord. And these two names are clearly distinguished, Iude v. 4. where the same thing is spoken of the same false teachers: there they are said to deny their Dominum & herum Lord and master; although he may be called their Herus, Master, he is not properly called their Dominus, Lord. Then againe, the Lord is not said to have redeemed all men, but only to have bought them: now although the word 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, to buy, be sometimes used in the same sense that the other is, yet it is not alwayes so.