A25280:1841
An analytical exposition of both the epistles of the Apostle Peter illustratedAn analyticall exposition of both the epistles of the Apostle Peter illustrated
An analytical exposition of both the epistles of the Apostle Peter illustrated by doctrines out of every text and applied by their uses for a further progress in holiness / by ... William Ames ...An analyticall exposition of both the epistles of the Apostle Peter illustrated by doctrines out of every text and applyed by their uses for a further progresse in holinesse / by ... William Ames ...
London: printed by E.G. for John Rothwell, 1641London: printed by E.G. for Iohn Rothwell, 1641
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Now the Apostle proves that which he had before laid down concerning the punishment that should befall false teachers. The conclusion of this arguing is, 1 In general propounded of all the wicked, v. 9. For there is the consequent part of that connex axiom, the antecedent whereof begins v. 4. and is showed by the connection If, as, If God spared not the Angels, &c. Then afterwards in special, of these false teachers themselves and their followers, v. 10. In the general conclusion, v. 9. he doth not barely set down the condemnation of the wicked, but also by a copulate axiom joins together with it, the deliverance of the godly from that temptation, which ariseth unto them by means of the wicked. And the reason is, because the Apostles purpose was, so to reprove the wicked, that he might in the mean time comfort the godly, and strengthen them against all the temptations, whereunto they were obnoxious by means of the wicked. In the antecedent part of this arguing he sets down three arguments, which are as so many examples & judgements of God against the wicked; & they may make three syllogisms to prove one and the same conclusion. The first example is of the Angels that fell, v. 4. The second is of the old world, v. 5. The third is of Sodom and Gomorrah. The syllogisms are knit together, after this manner: If God spared not the Angels, nor the old world, nor Sodom and Gomorrah; then he will not spare these false teachers; nor the like wicked men; But the former is true, by the testimony of Scripture, Therefore, &c. These examples in respect of the general conclusion, which is set down, v. 9. are as species unto their genus. But in respect of the special conclusion wch is set down, v. 10. they are as comparata, partly alike, partly greater. That wherein they are alike, consists therein, as God condemned those sinners so also will he condemn these. Their inequality therein; if God spared not his most excellent creatures, the Angels, nor the old world, nor those cities; then much less will he spare these false teachers.
NOw the Apostle proves that which he had before laid downe concerning the punishment that should befall false teachers. The conclusion of this arguing is, 1 In generall propounded of all the wicked, v. 9. For there is the consequent part of that connex axiom, the antecedent whereof begins v. 4. and is shewed by the connexion If, as, If God spared not the Angels, &c. Then afterwards in speciall, of these false teachers themselves and their followers, v. 10. In the generall conclusion, v. 9. he doth not barely set downe the condemnation of the wicked, but also by a copulate axiom joynes together with it, the deliverance of the godly from that temptation, which ariseth unto them by means of the wicked. And the reason is, because the Apostles purpose was, so to reprove the wicked, that he might in the mean time comfort the godly, and strengthen them against all the temptations, whereunto they were obnoxious by means of the wicked. In the antecedent part of this arguing he sets downe three arguments, which are as so many examples & judgements of God against the wicked; & they may make three syllogismes to prove one and the same conclusion. The first example is of the Angels that fell, v. 4. The second is of the old world, v. 5. The third is of Sodome and Gomorrha. The syllogismes are knit together, after this manner: If God spared not the Angels, nor the old world, nor Sodome and Gomorrha; then he will not spare these false teachers; nor the like wicked men; But the former is true, by the testimony of Scripture, Therefore, &c. These examples in respect of the generall conclusion, which is set downe, v. 9. are as species unto their genus. But in respect of the speciall conclusion wch is set down, v. 10. they are as comparata, partly alike, partly greater. That wherein they are alike, consists therein, as God condemned those sinners so also will he condemn these. Their inequality therein; if God spared not his most excellent creatures, the Angels, nor the old world, nor those cities; then much lesse will he spare these false teachers.