A25294:509
The substance of Christian religion, or, A plain and easy draught of the Christian…The substance of Christian religion, or, A plain and easie draught of the Christian…
The substance of Christian religion, or, A plain and easy draught of the Christian catechism in LII lectures on chosen texts of Scripture, for each Lords-day of the year, learnedly and perspicuously illustrated with doctrines, reasons, and uses / by that reverend and worthy labourer in the Lord's vineyard, William Ames ...The substance of Christian religion, or, A plain and easie draught of the Christian catechisme in LII lectures on chosen texts of Scripture, for each Lords-day of the year, learnedly and perspicuously illustrated with doctrines, reasons, and uses / by that reverend and worthy laborer in the Lord's vineyard, William Ames ...
London: printed by T. Mabb for Thomas Davies, 1659
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Joh. 10. 17, 18. 17, I lay down my life, that I may take it up again. 18. None taketh it from me, but I lay it down of my self. I have authority to lay it down, and I have authority or power to take it up again. This commandment received I of my Father.
Seeing the Text is the same, that it was before, the same analysis, that was there, may here also serve, and be made use of.
SEeing the Text is the same, that it was before, the same analysis, that was there, may here also serve, and be made use of.
Doct. 5. Christ rose again from the dead.
For this is it, that is understood in the Text, by taking up his life again. For this taking up again, is a reunion of things that were separated before: And in this reunion of the soul and body, there was a change or motion from an inferior condition to a superior of that, which was before in a better also or superior to this, from which the change is now: And therefore it is properly called a reassumption, or taking again, and not barely a resurrection. The form then from which this change was made, was from his state of humiliation; and the form to which, was the state of exaltation and glory; the subject of this transmutation or motion was Christs humane nature, which had fallen unto the lowest and abjectest condition of his humiliation. Christ's own body arose again from true death, and from the grave: And his soul also is said to have risen again,