A25478:279
A supplement to The Morning-exercise at Cripple-Gate, or, Several more cases of conscience practically…
A supplement to The Morning-exercise at Cripple-Gate, or, Several more cases of conscience practically resolved by sundry ministers
London: printed for Thomas Cockerill, 1676
Sermon 3: Wherein the love of the world is inconsistent with the love of God. Serm. III.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
11. Prop. To love the world is to affect some private, particular inferior. Good, for it self, as the chiefest Good, and last end. This proposition states and specifies the proper formal Object of worldly love; which is some private, particular inferior good, loved for it self, as the chiefest supreme good, and last end. Now the world may be constituted the chiefest good, and last end two ways. (1). Positively, when it is loved for it self as a total supreme good, unto which all things are referred. (2). Negatively, when, though it be loved only as a partial good, yet it is loved for it self, and not referred to God, either actually or habitually, as the supreme good. Such is the cursed love of many worldly professors, who love the world only as a partial good, yet so, as they refer it not to God the supreme good; and therefore may be said to love it for it self, as their last end and chiefest good, negatively, though not positively. This love to the world for it self, as the last end, and chiefest good, is fully described by John in the verse following our text, 1 John 2.16. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but it is of the world. These words give much light and evidence to our text and present subject; wherefore we shall a little insist on the explication of them.
11. Prop. To love the world is to affect some private, particular inferiour. Good, for it self, as the chiefest Good, and last end. This proposition states and specifies the proper formal Object of worldly love; which is some private, particular inferiour good, loved for it self, as the chiefest supreme good, and last end. Now the world may be constituted the chiefest good, and last end two ways. (1). Positively, when it is loved for it self as a total supreme good, unto which all things are referred. (2). Negatively, when, though it be loved only as a partial good, yet it is loved for it self, and not referred to God, either actually or habitually, as the supreme good. Such is the cursed love of many worldly professors, who love the world only as a partial good, yet so, as they refer it not to God the supreme good; and therefore may be said to love it for it self, as their last end and chiefest good, negatively, though not positively. This love to the world for it self, as the last end, and chiefest good, is fully described by John in the verse following our text,