A26853:609
An account of all the proceedings of the commissioners of both persuasions appointedAn accompt of all the proceedings of the commissioners of both persvvasions appointed
An account of all the proceedings of the commissioners of both persuasions appointed by His Sacred Majesty, according to letters patent, for the review of the Book of common prayer, &c.An accompt of all the proceedings of the commissioners of both persvvasions appointed by His Sacred Majesty, according to letters patent, for the review of the Book of common prayer, &c.
London : s.n., 1661
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Sect. 5. Sureties, &c. P. 24.
Ans. [It hath been accounted reasonable, and allowed by the best Laws, that Guardians should Covenant and contract for their Minors to their benefit; by the same right the Church hath appointed Sureties to undertake for Children, when they enter into Covenant with God by Baptism, (St. Aug. Ep. 23.) And this ⟨p. 112⟩general practice of the Church is enough to satisfy those that doubt.]
Ans. [It hath been accounted reasonable, and allowed by the best Laws, that Guardians should Covenant and contract for their Minors to their benefit; by the same right the Church hath appointed Sureties to undertake for Children, when they enter into Covenant with God by Baptism, (St. Aug. Ep. 23.) And this ⟨p. 112⟩general practice of the Church is enough to satisfie those that doubt.]
Rep. 1. Who made those Sureties Guardians of the Infants that are neither Parents, nor Pro-parents, not Owners of them? we are not now speaking against Sponsors: But you know that the very Original of those Sponsors is a great Controversy: And whether they were not at first most properly Sponsors for the Parents, that they should perform that part they undertook (because many Parents were Deserters, and many proved negligent) Sponsors then excluded not Parents from their proper undertaking, but joined with them; Godfathers are not the Infants Guardians with us, and therefore have not power thus to Covenant and Vow in their names: We entreat you to take heed of leaving any Children indeed out of the mutual Covenant that are baptised: How are those in the Covenant that cannot consent themselves, and do it not by any that truly represent them, nor have any Authority to act as in their names? The Authority of Parents being most unquestionable (who by nature, and the Word of God, have the power of disposing of their Children; and consequently of choosing and covenanting for them) Why should it not be preferred? at least, you may give leave to those Parents that desire it, to be the Dedicators of, and Covenanters for their own Children, and not force others on them whether they will or no. 2. But the question is not of Covenanting, but professing present Actual believing, forsaking, &c. In which though we believe the Churches sense was sound, yet we desire that all things, that may render it liable to misunderstanding, may be avoided,