A26859:21
Richard Baxters answer to Dr. Edward Stillingfleet's charge of separation containing, I. some queries…
Richard Baxters answer to Dr. Edward Stillingfleet's charge of separation containing, I. some queries necessary for the understanding of his accusation, II. a reply to his letter which denieth a solution, III. an answer to his printed sermon : humbly tendered, I. to himself, II. to the Right Honourable the Lord Mayor and the court of aldermen, III. to the readers of his accusation, the forum where we are accused.Richard Baxters answer to Dr. Edward Stillingfleet's charge of separation containing, I. some queries necessary for the understanding of his accusation, II. a reply to his letter which denyeth a solution, III. an answer to his printed sermon : humbly tendred, I. to himself, II. to the Right Honourable the Lord Mayor and the court of aldermen, III. to the readers of his accusation, the forum where we are accused.
London: printed for Nevil Simmons, 1680
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. Those that will Dispute before they agree of the sense of their terms or state the question, and then quarrel for not being understood.
2. Those that will not read or answer our fullest Defence already written, but look I should still begin anew.
3. Universalists, that can prove me to be an Ass, because I am an Animal.
3. Vniversallists, that can prove me to be an Ass, because I am an Animal.
4. Equivocators, that can prove me a Separatist because I sit not at their feet, or read not in their Book or with their Spectacles.
4. Equivocaters, that can prove me a Separatist because I sit not at their feet, or read not in their Book or with their Spectacles.