A26862:35
Aphorisms of justification, with their explication annexed wherein also is opened the nature of…Aphorismes of justification, with their explication annexed wherein also is opened the nature of…
Aphorisms of justification, with their explication annexed wherein also is opened the nature of the covenants, satisfaction, righteousness, faith, works, &c. : published especially for the use of the church of Kidderminster in Worcestershire / by their unworthy teacher Ri. Baxter.Aphorismes of justification, with their explication annexed wherein also is opened the nature of the covenants, satisfaction, righteousnesse, faith, works, &c. : published especially for the use of the church of Kederminster in Worcestershire / by their unworthy teacher Ri. Baxter.
Hague: printed by Abraham Brown, 1655
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Neither is this Distinction the same with that which differenceth Gods revealed Will from his secret. For his revealed Will containeth also part of the Will of his purpose, and all the will of precept: The mere prophesies, and also the promises and threatenings, so far as they point out future event, are the Revealed part of the Will of Gods purpose. Tilenus himself in his conference with Camero seems to approve of this Distinction; where he distinguisheth of Gods Will according to its Object, viz. vel quod ipse vult facere, vel quod a nobis vult fieri: If in this last branch he speak not de officio & of this preceptive will, rather then de eventu and of the will of purpose, then he can mean it only of a conditional will of purpose.
Neither is this Distinction the same with that which differenceth Gods revealed Will from his secret. For his revealed Will containeth also part of the Will of his purpose, and all the will of precept: The meere prophesies, and also the promises and threatnings, so far as they point out future event, are the Revealed part of the Will of Gods purpose. Tilenus himselfe in his conference with Camero seemes to approve of this Distinction; where he distinguisheth of Gods Will according to its Object, viz. vel quod ipse vult facere, vel quod a nobis vult fieri: If in this last branch he speake not de officio & of this preceptive will, rather then de eventu and of the will of purpose, then he can meane it onely of a conditionall will of purpose.
As we use to distinguish betwixt the legal will of the King publicly manifesting our duty in the Laws, and his personal private will; so must we do here.
As we use to distinguish betwixt the legall will of the King publickly manifesting our duty in the Laws, and his personall private will; so must we do here.