A26862:476
Aphorisms of justification, with their explication annexed wherein also is opened the nature of…Aphorismes of justification, with their explication annexed wherein also is opened the nature of…
Aphorisms of justification, with their explication annexed wherein also is opened the nature of the covenants, satisfaction, righteousness, faith, works, &c. : published especially for the use of the church of Kidderminster in Worcestershire / by their unworthy teacher Ri. Baxter.Aphorismes of justification, with their explication annexed wherein also is opened the nature of the covenants, satisfaction, righteousnesse, faith, works, &c. : published especially for the use of the church of Kederminster in Worcestershire / by their unworthy teacher Ri. Baxter.
Hague: printed by Abraham Brown, 1655
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
And yet I think he deserveth more thanks then either the Lawyer that justifieth him by Plea, or the Judge that justifies him by Sentence. So here; If you had rather: you may call it a necessary Antecedent. Or, if any man think fitter to call these Causes by another name, I much care not, so we agree concerning the nature of the thing.
And yet I think he deserveth more thanks then either the Laywer that justifieth him by Plea, or the Judge that justifies him by Sentence. So here; If you had rather: you may call it a necessary Antecedent. Or, if any man think fitter to call these Causes by another name, I much care not, so we agree concerning the nature of the thing.
To the third question. Christs Righteousness cannot be the material cause, of an Act which hath no matter. If any will call Christs Righteousness the matter of our Righteousness, though yet they speak improperly, yet far nearer the truth, then to call it the Matter of our Justification.
To the third question. Christs Righteousness cannot be the materiall cause, of an Act which hath no matter. If any will call Christs Righteousness the matter of our Righteousness, though yet they speak improperly, yet farre neerer the truth, then to call it the Matter of our Justification.
To the fourth Quest. That Imputation is not the Form, is undeniable. The form gives the name: especially to Actions, that have no matter. Imputation and Justification denote distinct Acts: And how then can Imputing be the Form of Justifying. Though I mention not Imputation in the Definition, nor among the Causes here, yet it is implied in the mention of Satisfaction, which must be made ours, or else we cannot be Justified by it. Though therefore, the Scripture do not ⟨p. 139⟩