A26865:604
An apology for the nonconformists ministry containing I. the reasons of their preaching, II.…
An apology for the nonconformists ministry containing I. the reasons of their preaching, II. an answer to the accusations urged as reasons for the silencing of about 2000 by Bishop Morley ..., III. reasons proving it the duty and interest of the bishops and conformists to endeavour earnestly their restoration : with a postscript upon oral debates with Mr. H. Dodwell, against his reasons for their silence ... : written in 1668 and 1669, for the most of it, and now published as an addition to the defence against Dr. Stillingfleet, and as an account to the silencers of the reasons of our practice / by Richard Baxter.
London: printed for T. Parkhurst and D. Newman, 1681
AN APOLOGY FOR THE SILENCED MINISTERS, Especially for their not cea… › Part › Accusation 31
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
8. But, judge all men of common Reason, sobriety and honesty of these mens Accusations now by the matter of fact it self, which I opened before as to a former Objection.
Again, Let common reason and equity here be judge of the ingenuity and credit of both these Defences: When of three men that were offered Bishoprics, but one delayed his resolution, and two that were offered Deaneries; and when the notorious reason was, to see whether the refused Conformity would stand or fall, when no one of them ever talked of accepting, if that Conformity should stand, and when these were but three men among Eighteen hundred Nonconformists that after were cast out (and that Conformity was Actually dispensed with at the time when one refused, one accepted, and three delayed). Whether this be a good proof that it was not Conscience, but Interest that these men stuck upon? and that consequently this is the chief reason that 1800 men subscribed not? And will not posterity rather think that the change may prove sad to the Church of England, when instead of so many men that are silenced for avoiding that which they fear to be Perjury, Lying and Covenanting against the Commands of Christ; ⟨p. 162⟩such men are set up, that dare talk at this rate, and that in Print, and with the mention of God and the day of judgment. And whereas the Debate-maker saith, That he heard some of them acknowledge that they scruple not what others do; through Gods mercy they are all, save Mr. Calamy, yet living, and solemnly profess that they never so thought or said to him, or any other, but have oft openly professed the contrary: But if he means any others, what proof is that of these accused persons thoughts?
Again, Let common reason and equity here be judge of the ingenuity and credit of both these Defences: When of three men that were offered Bishopricks, but one delayed his resolution, and two that were offered Deaneries; and when the notorious reason was, to see whether the refused Conformity would stand or fall, when no one of them ever talkt of accepting, if that Conformity should stand, and when these were but three men among Eighteen hundred Nonconformists that after were cast out (and that Conformity was Actually dispensed with at the time when one refused, one accepted, and three delayed). Whether this be a good proof that it was not Conscience, but Interest that these men stuck upon? and that consequently this is the chief reason that 1800 men subscribed not? And will not posterity rather think that the change may prove sad to the Church of England, when instead of so many men that are silenced for avoiding that which they fear to be Perjury, Lying and Covenanting against the Commands of Christ;