A26880:1118
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1684
The Twelve Arguments said to be Dr. Owens, impartially considered.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Now I crave a sober Answer to this, 1. Whether a Liturgy had not been better than no Worship for six days in seven? 2. Whether these Itinerants, that so dangerously erred in Doctrine, were not more sadly destitute of the help of the Spirit, than they that only wanted ability to utter sound words without a Form, or Books? And had not good forms been safer for that People, than the Doctrine of Mr. Erbury, Mr. Crad•k, Vavasor Powell, Morgan Lloyd of Wrexham, (known also in Print). It grieved me to talk with one of these Itinerants in 1663, who came to me for Counsel: He had been an Anabaptist set up for an Itinerant over many Parishes; I examined him, and found that he had not any more learning than to read English, and was grossly Ignorant in Divinity: ⟨p. 29⟩He was ordained for all that by a Bishop and conformed; I wondered how he past their Examination: He told me that they asked him no questions about his Learning or Knowledge, but only whether he would Conform, and so ordained him.
Now I crave a sober Answer to this, 1. Whether a Liturgy had not been better than no Worship for six days in seven? 2. Whether these Itinerants, that so dangerously erred in Doctrine, were not more sadly destitute of the help of the Spirit, than they that only wanted ability to utter sound words without a Form, or Books? And had not good forms been safer for that People, than the Doctrine of Mr. Erbury, Mr. Crad•k, Vavasor Powel, Morgan Lloyd of Wrexham, (known also in Print). It grieved me to talk with one of these Itinerants in 1663, who came to me for Counsel: He had been an Anabaptist set up for an Itinerant over many Parishes; I examined him, and found that he had not any more learning than to read English, and was grosly Ignorant in Divinity: ⟨p. 29⟩He was ordained for all that by a Bishop and conformed; I wondered how he past their Examination: He told me that they askt him no questions about his Learning or Knowledg, but only whether he would Conform, and so ordained him.