A26880:1254
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
No doubt but now this is D. O's mind.
If any one think that my Answers to him, favour of too much disrespect, (which I fitted merely to the Words I answered) confessing my imprudence and liableness to such faultiness; I desire that none will approve my failings, blame me for them, but do not therefore justify true Schism, and blame the cause of Love and Catholic Communion.
If any one think that my Answers to him, favour of too much disrespect, (which I fitted meerly to the Words I answered) confessing my imprudence and liableness to such faultiness; I desire that none will approve my failings, blame me for them, but do not therefore justifie true Schism, and blame the cause of Love and Catholick Communion.
As to the mention of former miscarriages, which arose from the Spirit and Principles of Division; the Drs. Argument led me to mention them so necessarily, that I must else have wronged the Cause and Truth Defended: And I had great reasons, I thought, both for that, and for this Defence, which I shall next enumerate.