Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…

XLIX. 13. It's a common case under Turks and Heathens, that they give liberty of Conscience for Christians of all parties: Now suppose that in A••ppo, in Constantinople or elsewhere, there be (partly for Country sake, and partly for Language, but most for different Judgments) one Church of Armenians, one of Greeks, one of English-men, &c. what Law of God makes only one of these to be a true Church, and which is it?

XLIX. 13. It's a common case under Turks and Heathens, that they give liberty of Conscience for Christians of all parties: Now suppose that in A••ppo, in Constantinople or elsewhere, there be (partly for Countrey sake, and partly for Language, but most for different Judgments) one Church of Armenians, one of Greeks, one of English-men, &c. what Law of God makes only one of these to be a true Church, and which is it?

L. 14. Suppose that the settled Church e. g. in Holland, Sweden, Saxony, is for Presbytery, or for an Episcopacy that arose from Presbyters ordination, or that had none or a short Liturgy, and the Prince would tolerate English men (as Frankford did) to set up a Church of the English Form and Liturgy, I think few Prelatists would deny it to be lawful.

L. 14. Suppose that the setled Church e. g. in Holland, Sweden, Saxony, is for Presbytery, or for an Episcopacy that arose from Presbyters ordination, or that had none or a short Liturgy, and the Prince would tolerate English men (as Frankford did) to set up a Church of the English Form and Liturgy, I think few Prelatists would deny it to be lawful.