Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…

LXII. 12. If it be true that John Major, Fordone, and others say that Presbytery was the Government of the Church of Scotland before Episcopacy was brought in, was the introduction of Episcopacy by Palladius a damning ⟨p. 35⟩Schism by separating from the former, or a Reformation; is just Reformation Schism?

LXII. 12. If it be true that Iohn Maior, Fordon, and others say that Presbytery was the Government of the Church of Scotland before Episcopacy was brought in, was the introduction of Episcopacy by Palladius a damning ⟨p. 35⟩Schism by separating from the former, or a Reformation; is just Reformation Schism?

LXIII. 13. When the Church first set up Patriarchs, Metropolitans, General Councils, Monasteries, Parish Churches distinct from Cathedrals, Organs, New Liturgies, and multitudes of Ceremonies, this was a departing or separating from the contrary Church way which was there before, was it therefore Schism?

LXIV. 14. When Socrates tells us of some Countries that had Bishops in the Country Villages (like our Parishes) was it a damning Schism to separate from this custom, by decreeing that even small Cities should have no Bishops, Ne vilescat nomen Episcopi? or when the Chorepiscopi were put down, where they had been?

LXIV. 14. When Socrates tells us of some Countreys that had Bishops in the Countrey Villages (like our Parishes) was it a damning Schism to separate from this custome, by decreeing that even small Cities should have no Bishops, Ne vilescat nomen Episcopi? or when the Chorepiscopi were put down, where they had been?