Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…

LXVI. 16. The same I say of a Parish Church; he that locally removeth, e. g. from a Church that hath Organs, to one that hath none, separateth from a pair of Organs, but not Mentally from the Church, unless the Organs be its essence.

LXVII. 17. They that are for the true ancient Episcopacy, (e. g. as much as Arch-Bishop Usher's Reduction which we offered did contain) but dislike the Lay Civilians power of the Keys, and Officials, Surrogates, Arch-deacons Government, &c. do not separate from the Church as Episcopal, but from the humane Novelties which they disown.

LXVII. 17. They that are for the true antient Episcopacy, (e. g. as much as Arch-Bishop Vsher's Reduction which we offer'd did contain) but dislike the Lay Civilians power of the Keyes, and Officials, Surrogates, Arch-deacons Government, &c. do not separate from the Church as Episcopal, but from the humane Novelties which they disown.

LXVIII. 18. If a Parishioner fall out with his Priest, and they go to Law about Tithes, Glebes, Words, &c. and the Suit be long, and the man dare not Communicate with him believing that he hateth him, though the animosity should be culpable, being but personal, his going from him to another Church is not separating from Christ; (for I hope that even Mr. Dodwell himself will not say that every Priest is Christ.)

LXVIII. 18. If a Parishioner fall out with his Priest, and they goe to Law about Tythes, Glebes, Words, &c. and the Suit be long, and the man dare not Communicate with him believing that he hateth him, thô the animosity should be culpable, being but personal, his going from him to another Church is not separating from Christ; (for I hope that even Mr. Dodwell himself will not say that every Priest is Christ.)