Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…

LXXXII. 32. He that is unjustly cast out of the Church, and by its very Laws excommunicated ipso facto, is no damned or Sinful Schismatic for Worshipping God in a Church that will receive him: Nor any one that is denied Communion unless he will sin; Much more if they should prove half as many and great Sins as the Nonconformists have said they fear (in the first Plea for Peace, &c.)

LXXXII. 32. He that is unjustly cast out of the Church, and by its very Laws excommunicated ipso facto, is no damned or Sinful Schismatick for Worshipping God in a Church that will receive him: Nor any one that is denyed Communion unless he will sin; Much more if they should prove half as many and great Sins as the Nonconformists have said they fear (in the first Plea for Peace, &c.)

LXXXIII. 33. If a Foreigner that doth but half understand our language, withdraw to a Church and Pastor whose tongue he understands, obeying God and Nature is no damning Schism.

LXXXIV. 34. If one that is erroneously conceited of the obligation of General Councils, should think it a sin to kneel at the Sacrament on any Lords day in the year, or any Week day between Easter and Whitsuntide, because Tradition and the twentieth Canon of the first Council, and that at Trull, &c. do forbid then to adore kneeling, this separating on that account to another Congregation is not damning.