Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…

All that contrary to Art. 21. say, that General or other Councils may be gathered without the command and will of Princes, and deny they may err, and things ordained by them as necessary to Salvation have neither Strength nor Authority, unless it may be declared that they are taken out of Holy Scripture.

All that contrary to Art. 21. say, that General or other Councils may be gathered without the command and will of Princes, and deny they may erre, and things ordained by them as necessary to Salvation have neither Strength nor Authority, unless it may be declared that they are taken out of Holy Scripture.

Those that deny Art. 23. that those are lawfully called and sent into the Ministry, who have public Authority given them in the Congregation, to call and send Ministers into the Lords Vineyard, are chosen and called hereto, (for want of Canonical Succession.)

Those that deny Art. 23. that those are lawfully called and sent into the Ministry, who have publick Authority given them in the Congregation, to call and send Ministers into the Lords Vineyard, are chosen and called hereto, (for want of Canonical Succession.)

Those that contrary to Art. 24. would have Gods Worship performed to them that understand not the language, to avoid the Schism of having many Churches in a City.