A26880:291
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Those that contrary to Art. 24. would have Gods Worship performed to them that understand not the language, to avoid the Schism of having many Churches in a City.
Those that take Confirmation or Penance, or the other three for Sacraments of the Gospel contrary to Art 25.
Those that contrary to Art. 26. would not have it believed to be the Peoples duty, who know the Offences of Bad Ministers, to accuse them.
All that contrary to Art. 27. are against Infant Baptism, as agreeable to Christs Institution.
All that contrary to Art. 28. say, the Body of Christ is given and taken and eaten in the Sacrament otherwise than in a Spiritual manner by Faith.