Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…

What a Privilege is it, that a Man may believe this about any such thing without Schism and Damnation! And how dreadful to fall into such Churchmen's hands that in their Case make it Schism, Separation and Damnation. But there is a Remedy.

What a Priviledg is it, that a Man may believe this about any such thing without Schisme and Damnation! And how dreadful to fall into such Churchmens hands that in their Case make it Schisme, Separation and Damnation. But there is a Remedy.

§. 5. But he hath reason for what he saith: p. 3, 4. [Indeed it is extremely absurd and unreasonable, to say, that the Christian Church, which is built on the same Foundation, &c. who enjoy all Privileges in Common, should be divided into as distinct and separate Bodies, though of the same kind and nature, as Peter, James and John are distinct Persons — It's absurd to say, That where every thing is common there is not one Community.

§. 5. But he hath reason for what he saith: p. 3, 4. [Indeed it is extreamly absurd and unreasonable, to say, that the Christian Church, which is built on the same Foundation, &c. who enjoy all Priviledges in Common, should be divided into as distinct and separate Bodies, thô of the same kind and nature, as Peter, Iames and Iohn are distinct Persons — It's absurd to say, That where every thing is common there is not one Community.

Ans. Let us not swallow this without Chewing: 1. Whether all be extremely absurd and unreasonable which such Doctors call so; I am grown to doubt as much as whether all be Schism which Schismatics call so▪ Ipse dixit is no Proof.

Ans. Let us not swallow this without Chewing: 1. Whether all be extreamly absurd and unreasonable which such Doctors call so; I am grown to doubt as much as whether all be Schism which Schismaticks call so Ipse dixit is no Proof.