Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…

Ans. You had not the Wit to let it pass: Durst I have accused you of ⟨p. 18⟩what you bewray and accuse your self? Reader, Is not the Matter a Part? And is not the Form a Part (of the man)? And doth that man speak plainer, that barely calleth either of them [a Part], and tells you not [which Part it is], Matter or Form? If one of his Pupils should say, Sir, you should not call the Soul the Form, but [a Part], nor the Body the Matter, but a Part; what would the Boys say to him?

§ 21. He goes on, [Thus an Organical Church is the constitutive Matter: Of what? Of Christ? or of his Church? or of some third compound•d?

Ans. 1. Did I say, [An Organical Church, or an Organical Body]? When Aristotle saith, [the soul is entelechia corporis physici organici], doth he say, [Hominis physici Organici]? But you are an enemy to vain Philosophy and distinction.