A26880:623
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ...…
Catholic communion defended against both extremes, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...Catholick communion defended against both extreams, and unnecessary division confuted in five parts ... / by Richard Baxter ...
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1684
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Was Cyprian and all the African and Numidian Bishops separate from Christ, or the Pope — in Augustin's days, when there was so long opposition between three Popes and Aurelius, Augustine, and the rest of the Africans, which party was unchristened?
Was Cyprian and all the African and Numidian Bishops separate from Christ, or the Pope — in Augustin's daies, when there was so long opposition between three Popes and Aurelius, Augustine, and the rest of the Africans, which party was unchristened?
Was it (Miracle-working) St. Martin, that was unchristened, or the Synods of Bishops whose Communion he renounced to the Death?
Epiphanius giveth so high a character of Audius, that wise men think his Separation from the Bishops that abhorred his reproof, unchristened him not.
Socrates and S•zomen, tells us of great diversity and opposition in the Communions of many Countries, about Easter, and other things, that yet unchristened them not.